tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31669215.post6983128954599268631..comments2024-02-02T12:19:39.504-07:00Comments on V for Victory!: Do We Believe Him Yet?Anita Moorehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11305092097247290243noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31669215.post-28129136820660683842008-06-03T19:36:00.000-06:002008-06-03T19:36:00.000-06:00Silly Anita. Don't you know that Ahmadinejad was ...Silly Anita. Don't you know that Ahmadinejad was speaking metaphorically?<BR/><BR/>That's what the lefties tell me . . .<BR/><BR/>/sarcPaulhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12423691524148589916noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31669215.post-57929346234802861042008-06-03T10:51:00.000-06:002008-06-03T10:51:00.000-06:00I suspect in characterizing a past enemy as a luna...<I>I suspect in characterizing a past enemy as a lunatic, we fail to recognize his seductive appeal and the presence of his policies among us, embraced without regard to their consequences.</I><BR/><BR/>Not at all. I use the term "lunatic" not in a clinical sense, but to describe the derangement that results from embracing evil (which itself has always been seductive in a fallen world). My point was not to dismiss the past enemy as a mere lunatic, but to point out the danger of doing so.Anita Moorehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11305092097247290243noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31669215.post-34397908496076167322008-06-03T10:39:00.000-06:002008-06-03T10:39:00.000-06:00I suspect in characterizing a past enemy as a luna...I suspect in characterizing a past enemy as a lunatic, we fail to recognize his seductive appeal and the presence of his policies among us, embraced without regard to their consequences.Markhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02261197566240560777noreply@blogger.com