The common good entails respect for people's sensibilities. I hasten to add, in our cock-eyed world: people's legitimate sensibilities. Legitimate sensibilities are reasonable and grounded in nature and reality. Sensibilities that are unreasonable, grounded in fantasy, and purport to require other people to give way before them at all costs, are not legitimate and should not be catered to.
Recall that the good of individuals is bound up in, and not swallowed up by, the common good. The good of individuals involves consideration for their feelings, and for their attachments -- to family and friends, to places, to neighborhoods, to institutions, to culture, to manners, to creeds, to traditions. The common good is not being served in any situation where callousness is institutionalized. Where flesh-and-blood human beings are viewed as raw material to be "formed" and "molded" and experimented on according to some ideology, and can be uprooted and moved around and situated and employed according to the pleasure of governing elites -- and where there is no real emergency, like armed invasion, forcing a drastic change in priorities -- the common good is being trampled. If you treat people's feelings as worthless, and their legitimate, natural attachments and aspirations as stupid and pointless, they begin to believe it, and to treat others accordingly. Then we shouldn't be surprised when crassness and coarseness and even violence become widespread.
When people are objects to have things done to rather than for; when they are valued only to the extent they are "useful"; when their feelings and sensibilities are trivialized; then the common good is being violated.